The Federal Government has filed a civil case in the Supreme Court against governors of the 36 states of the federation for alleged malpractice in the administration of Local Government Areas (LGAs).
FG, in the action SC/CV/343/2024, brought by the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, seeks complete autonomy for all LGAs in the nation as the third tier of government.
It particularly requested that the Supreme Court issue an order preventing state governors from unilaterally, arbitrarily, and unlawfully dissolving democratically elected local government leaders.
In addition, an order allowing monies in local governments’ credits to be directly channeled to them from the Federation Account in accordance with Constitutional principles, as opposed to the claimed illegal joint accounts formed by governors.
Furthermore, the FG requested an injunction from the Supreme Court prohibiting governors from forming Caretaker Committees to manage local governments in violation of the constitution’s recognized and established democratic system.
It also sought an injunction prohibiting governors, their agents, and privies from receiving, spending, or tampering with funds released from the Federation Account for the benefit of local governments in states without a democratically elected local government system.
The governors of the 36 States were sued by their respective Attorneys General.
In the 27 reasons it outlined in support of the action, FG contended that Nigeria, as a federation, was created by the 1999 Constitution, as amended, with the president, as head of the federal executive arm, taking an oath to defend and carry out the provisions of the constitution.
FG told the apex court, “That the governors represent the component states of the Federation with Executive Governors who have also sworn to uphold the Constitution and to at all times, give effect to the Constitution and that the Constitution, being the supreme law, has binding force all over the Federation of Nigeria.
“That the Constitution of Nigeria recognizes federal, states and local governments as three tiers of government and that the three recognized tiers of government draw funds for their operation and functioning from the Federation Account created by the Constitution.
“That by the provisions of the Constitution, there must be a democratically elected local government system and that the Constitution has not made provisions for any other systems of governance at the local government level other than democratically elected local government system.
“That in the face of the clear provisions of the Constitution, the governors have failed and refused to put in place a democratically elected local government system even where no state of emergency has been declared to warrant the suspension of democratic institutions in the state.
“That the failure of the governors to put democratically elected local government system in place, is a deliberate subversion of the 1999 Constitution which they and the President have sworn to uphold.
“That all efforts to make the governors comply with the dictates of the 1999 Constitution in terms of putting in place, a democratically elected local government system, has not yielded any result and that to continue to disburse funds from the Federation Account to governors for non existing democratically elected local government is to undermine the sanctity of the 1999 Constitution.
“That in the face of the violations of the 1999 Constitution, the federal government is not obligated under section 162 of the Constitution to pay any State, funds standing to the credit of local governments where no democratically elected local government is in place.”
It, therefore, prayed the Supreme Court to invoke sections 1, 4, 5, 7 and 14 of the Constitution to declare that the State Governors and State Houses of Assembly are under obligation to ensure a democratic system at the third tier of government in Nigeria and to also invoke the same sections to hold that the governors cannot lawfully dissolve democratically elected local government councils.
It equally asked the invocation of sections 1, 4, 5, 7 and 14 of the Constitution to declare that dissolution of democratically elected local government Councils by the Governors or anyone using the state powers derivable from laws enacted by the State Houses of Assembly or any Executive Order, is unlawful, unconstitutional, null and void.
In a 13 paragraghs affidavit that was deposed to by one Kelechi Ohaeri from the Federal Ministry of Justice, the AGF said he filed the suit under the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, on behalf of the FG.
The deponent averred that local government system recognized by the Constitution is a democratically elected local government councils, adding that the amount due to local government Councils from the Federation Account is to be paid to local government system recognized by the Constitution.
FG vowed that it would during the hearing of the mater, tender Daily Post online publication of January 29, 2024 titled “LG Administration; 15 Govs under scrutiny over Constitutional breach”, Vanguard online special report of September 12, 2023, Guardian editorial of January 23, 2024, Premium Times online publication of December 1, 2023, Vanguard online publication of December 1, 2023 and Arise online news of December 2, 2023, to justify the national importance and the public interest on the issue of granting autonomy to LGAs in the country.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has fixed May 30 to hear the suit.