Social commentator and media personality Daniel Regha has delivered a sweeping critique of Nigeria’s political culture, accusing citizens of embracing dangerous false narratives, selective outrage, and intellectual complacency that continue to undermine national progress.
In a post shared on his official X (formerly Twitter) account on Friday, Regha outlined what he described as the “unfortunate mentality” shaping public discourse in Nigeria today, warning that such thinking fuels division, weakens accountability, and entrenches poor leadership.
According to Regha, political criticism in Nigeria is increasingly interpreted through partisan lenses, where dissent is no longer seen as civic responsibility but as hidden loyalty to rival political camps.
“If you criticise ADC, you are assumed to be working for APC,” he wrote, noting that constructive engagement has been replaced by suspicion and name-calling. He added that speaking against the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is often dismissed as tribal bias or an inability to acknowledge progress, rather than a legitimate demand for accountability.
Regha also condemned the normalisation of cybercrime, pointing out a troubling trend where internet fraud, commonly referred to as “Yahoo,” is excused on the grounds that politicians are corrupt.
“Yahoo is suddenly okay because politicians are thieves,” he noted, describing the mindset as a moral collapse that justifies wrongdoing by comparing it to larger crimes.
Beyond politics, the commentator highlighted how ethnic and regional stereotypes are weaponised in national conversations. He criticised the tendency to blame Northerners for insecurity, accuse Igbos of fuelling division, and fault Yorubas for the electoral victory of President Tinubu, warning that such narratives oversimplify complex issues and deepen mistrust among Nigeria’s diverse communities.
Support for any region, Regha observed, is often framed as denial of national problems, regardless of context or intent. He described this as a deliberate distortion that stifles honest dialogue and reinforces polarisation.
Religion also featured prominently in his critique. Regha questioned why religious leaders are treated as beyond scrutiny, arguing that questioning authority within faith communities is wrongly portrayed as disrespect or an attack on belief itself.
“How dare you?” he wrote sarcastically, suggesting that blind reverence has allowed abuse of influence to go unchecked.
He further criticised what he termed “political prostitution”, lamenting a culture where shifting loyalties and opportunistic alliances are accepted as long as they serve immediate interests. Similarly, he challenged the glorification of elites who control essential services, despite profiting from citizens’ hardship.
READ ALSO: APC Defends Tinubu’s Borrowing, Says Obi’s Criticism Lacks Credibility
“The elites in charge of basic necessities are hailed as heroes, even as they profit from our struggles,” Regha said.
Perhaps the most troubling mindset, according to him, is the growing belief that individual votes do not count, a perception he warned could erode democratic participation and hand more power to entrenched interests.
“But the most unfortunate one is believing that whether you vote or not, it doesn’t count,” he wrote.
Regha’s remarks have since sparked debate online, resonating with Nigerians frustrated by rising costs of living, political divisions, and declining trust in institutions. His critique reflects a broader anxiety about civic disengagement and the moral compromises many believe are weakening the country’s democratic fabric.
As Nigeria grapples with economic strain and political realignment, Regha’s intervention serves as a pointed reminder that national renewal requires not just new leaders, but a reassessment of collective attitudes and values.