ETIM EFFIONG
Victor Okpara, the defence counsel of Chukwudimeme Onwuamadike, aka Evans, on Wednesday said the ongoing strike by the Judiciary Staff
Union of Nigeria has stalled the trial of his client.
It was learnt that Evans was to continue his defence on Wednesday
before Justice Hakeem Oshodi of an Ikeja High Court for the alleged
kidnap of Donatus Dunu, the Managing Director of the Maydon
Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
According to Okpara, Evans had opened his defence and testified that
he was innocent of all the allegations levelled against him by the
state.
former-military-administrator-of-oyo-state-usman-is-dead
“He has testified before the court as to his innocence regarding all
the charges levelled against him as contained in the charge sheet.
“The matter was adjourned until April 14, for continuation of trial,
because we have some other witnesses who are to corroborate what he has said but we cannot go on due to the strike,” he said.
The counsel noted that though the ongoing strike by JUSUN had
prevented the case, he added that the demands of the judicial workers
was for the overall good of the judiciary.
He added: “JUSUN is fighting for the financial autonomy of the judiciary which every right-thinking lawyer should actually support.
“We cannot say our judiciary is truly independent when they are tied
to the apron strings of the executive and they usually go cap in hand
asking for money.”
Evans was arraigned before Justice Oshodi on August 31, 2017, on two
counts conspiracy and kidnapping alongside five co-defendants.
His co-defendants are – Uche Amadi, Okwuchukwu Nwachukwu, Ogechi Uchechukwu, Chilaka Ifeanyi and Victor Aduba.
According to the prosecution, the defendant allegedly kidnapped Dunu
along Ilupeju Road, Lagos on Feb. 14, 2017, and collected 223,000
Euros as ransom from his family.
The trial has been delayed due to Evans’ changing his legal
representation five times and most recently, the ongoing JUSUN strike
which began on April 6.
Four prosecution witnesses including Dunu testified during the trial on behalf of the state.
As at the time of filing this report, the court has not fixed a new date for continuation of trial due to the strike.