For nearly five decades, the conflict between the United States and Iran simmered just beneath the surface — marked by diplomatic maneuvering, proxy battles, and economic sanctions. But with one presidential order, that era ended.
President Donald Trump’s decision to launch direct military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites has dragged the long-standing standoff into the light, marking a major escalation with unpredictable consequences.
The move — openly encouraged by Israel — arrives at a moment of extreme volatility in the Middle East, and experts warn its long-term impact could reshape the regional balance of power.
“This action may have tactical logic, but we won’t know if it was successful unless Iran remains non-nuclear for the next three to five years,” said Kenneth Pollack, a former CIA analyst and now a senior policy expert at the Middle East Institute.
The strikes, carried out in coordination with Israel, come as Iran’s regional position is weaker than it has been in decades.
Hezbollah in Lebanon has suffered devastating Israeli blows, the Assad regime in Syria — Iran’s key Arab ally — has fallen, and Iran’s economy remains battered under international sanctions.
Internally, the Islamic Republic has faced rising unrest, especially since the 2022 death of Mahsa Amini sparked widespread anti-government protests.
And yet, analysts warn the attacks may backfire.
“Iran may now be more motivated than ever to acquire a nuclear weapon,” said Trita Parsi of the Quincy Institute. “We should not confuse short-term military success with strategic victory.”
Trump’s order comes just weeks after publicly expressing optimism about renewed talks with Iran during a trip to Gulf Arab states.
Diplomats were reportedly preparing for back-channel negotiations — until Israel began its military campaign against Iranian-linked targets and Trump abruptly aligned with it.
“This was not a president dragged into war,” said Ted Deutch, former congressman and head of the American Jewish Committee. “This administration tried diplomacy. Iran refused.”
READ ALSO: Trump Praises Israeli Strike on Iran, Warns of More to Come
But critics argue the sudden turn from negotiations to missile strikes undermines any future diplomatic credibility.
“Trump ended his own outreach, making it nearly impossible to rebuild trust,” said Jennifer Kavanagh, defense analyst at the think tank Defense Priorities.
Images of the aftermath of Iran’s missile retaliation — hospitals hit in Israel, rubble in Tel Aviv suburbs, and dozens injured — have inflamed public opinion across the region.
Protesters in Australia and Europe rallied against both U.S. and Israeli actions, while Arab League diplomats convened emergency talks.
“Iran may now dig in, using the strikes to justify hardline policies internally and to rally regional allies,” said Karim Sadjadpour, of the Carnegie Endowment. “Or this could be the beginning of the end for the Islamic Republic. We’re watching a historic moment unfold.”
While the Pentagon declared key targets “neutralized,” the broader implications — for nuclear non-proliferation, for the Gulf’s fragile alliances, and for U.S. leadership on the world stage — remain to be seen.
“This is an unprecedented turning point,” Sadjadpour added. “We may not fully understand its consequences for decades.”