Human rights activist and former presidential candidate Omoyele Sowore has launched a blistering attack on the United Nations, describing the global body as impotent, compromised, and largely irrelevant in the face of alleged abuses of power by dominant world leaders.
In a statement posted on his official X (formerly Twitter) account on Saturday, Sowore accused U.S. President Donald Trump of pursuing what he described as an illegal regime-change agenda in Venezuela, citing alleged actions against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife as evidence of unchecked unilateral aggression.
Sowore argued that the UN’s inability to restrain powerful nations from violating international norms exposes what he termed a deep and incurable structural rot within the organisation. According to him, the body has failed in its core mandate of protecting humanity from war crimes, abuses of power, and the ambitions of dominant political figures.
“The UN has devolved into a ceremonial tea party,” Sowore wrote, asserting that an institution incapable of shielding the world from the “ego, bloodlust, and unchecked ambition of a single man obsessed with dominance” has forfeited its legitimacy.
The activist’s remarks reflect a growing frustration among critics of the UN, who argue that the organisation’s structure — particularly the veto power held by permanent members of the Security Council — has rendered it ineffective whenever the interests of powerful states are involved.
Going further, Sowore called for the complete dissolution of the United Nations, advocating its replacement with a credible coalition of nation-states designed to genuinely serve humanity, uphold justice, and prevent tyranny rather than legitimise it through inaction.
READ ALSO: Sowore Rejects US Military Support, Says ‘Someone Who Enslaved You Can’t Love You’
His comments come amid heightened global tensions and renewed scrutiny of international institutions’ roles in addressing conflicts, sovereignty violations, and humanitarian crises worldwide. While supporters of the UN maintain that reform, not dismantling, remains the most viable option, critics like Sowore insist that the organisation has outlived its usefulness in its current form.
Sowore’s statement has since sparked debate online, with supporters applauding his uncompromising stance on global accountability, while others warn that abolishing the UN could create a dangerous vacuum in international diplomacy and conflict resolution.
As controversies surrounding Venezuela and global power politics persist, the remarks underscore broader questions about who enforces international law when the institutions meant to do so are seen as unwilling or unable to act.